Have we tested Lorentz invariance enough?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

17 pages, Talk given at 'From Quantum to Emergent Gravity: Theory and Phenomenology', SISSA, June 2007

Scientific paper

Motivated by ideas from quantum gravity, Lorentz invariance has undergone many stringent tests over the past decade and passed every one. Since there is no conclusive reason from quantum gravity that the symmetry \textit{must} be violated at some point we should ask the questions: a) are the existing tests sufficient that the symmetry is already likely exact at the Planck scale? b) Are further tests simply blind searches for new physics without reasonable expectation of a positive signal? Here we argue that the existing tests are not quite sufficient and describe some theoretically interesting areas of existing parameterizations for Lorentz violation in the infrared that are not yet ruled out but are accessible (or almost accessible) by current experiments. We illustrate this point using a vector field model for Lorentz violation containing operators up to mass dimension six and analyzing how terrestrial experiments, neutrino observatories, and Auger results on ultra-high energy cosmic rays limit this model.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Have we tested Lorentz invariance enough? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Have we tested Lorentz invariance enough?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Have we tested Lorentz invariance enough? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-107858

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.