Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
May 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007aas...21011105b&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society Meeting 210, #111.05; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 39, p.236
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
2
Scientific paper
One of the great success stories in stellar structure and evolution calculations is the standard solar model. Helioseismic techniques show that the models differ from the Sun by only fractions of a per cent. Recent claims that the solar heavy-element abundance is lower than what it was believed to be, has dramatically worsened the match between standard solar models and the Sun, and has led to speculation that the inputs needed to make solar models are incorrect. I shall discuss the problems caused by the claimed lower abundances and show that for the the low abundances to be correct, almost all inputs into solar models must be incorrect. In fact helioseismology data seems to suggest that low abundances are incorrect.
No associations
LandOfFree
Are Inputs to Standard Solar Models Correct? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Are Inputs to Standard Solar Models Correct?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Are Inputs to Standard Solar Models Correct? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1034325