Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Feb 1987
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1987apj...313..551w&link_type=abstract
Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 313, Feb. 15, 1987, p. 551-555.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
4
Astronomical Models, Cosmology, Extragalactic Radio Sources, Time Measurement, Quasars, Red Shift
Scientific paper
The chronometric cosmology (a static, homogeneous, and hence nonevolving model proposed by Segal) is unable to explain the steep number versus flux law N(S) for quasars or extragalactic radio sources. The explanation given by Segal to explain the steep N(S) laws gives at best a small increase over a Euclidean N(S) proportional to S exp-1.5, and requires that the source spectral index be close to but greater than zero to create the effect. For typical radio spectral indices of roughly 0.75, the chronometric model cannot give a quantitative fit to the excess number of 1-3 Jy sources that the standard cosmology attributes to evolution. Thus the chronometric model can explain a steep N(S) law only for flat spectrum sources, while the observations show the steepest N(S) law for steep spectrum sources. Furthermore, the observed N(S) law for ultraviolet excess quasars is steeper than the steepest possible chronometric prediction.
No associations
LandOfFree
Source counts in the chronometric cosmology does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Source counts in the chronometric cosmology, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Source counts in the chronometric cosmology will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1011659