Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Nov 2008
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2008jahh...11..235l&link_type=abstract
Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (ISSN 1440-2807), Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 235 - 246 (2008).
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
W. Herschel, I. Roberts, D. Klumpke Roberts, J.G. Hagen, Fifty-Two Fields Of Nebulosity, Extensive Nebulosity, Dark Clouds
Scientific paper
Since its publication in 1811, William Herschel's list of fifty-two fields of extensive nebulosity has been largely disregarded, or even discredited, by the astronomical community. Neither he nor his successors decided to include the observations of large structureless fields of background nebulosity in their major catalogues. lt was only during a short period in the early twentieth century that astronomers like I. Roberts, E.E. Barnard, and M. Wolf started more serious investigations into the nature and reality of Herschel's nebulosities, but without deriving conclusive results. Those few who tried to understand Herschel's elusive observations were often puzzled by his ambiguous descriptions and frequently tended to reject the nebulosities as being optical illusions, because only a small number of them could be proven by celestial photography. The only unconditional supporter of the reality of the nebulosities was Johann Georg Hagen, who in the 1920s used them as evidence for his hypothesis that nebulous matter covered almost the entire celestial sphere. He claimed to have succeeded in visually observing nebulous matter in every single one of Herschel's fields, which raised sharp opposition from his numerous critics. The questionable quality of Herschel's original descriptions, the weak supporting arguments, and the lack of photographic evidence, finally led historians to conclude that Herschel's fifty-two fields of extensive nebulosity were illusions. But it would seem astonishing that this gifted observer could have been fooled to such an extent. As a first approach to investigate this apparent anomaly, a complete analysis of Herschel's observing books was carried out, and the raw observations of the various catalogued nebulous fields were extracted. Some important stylistic uncertainties in the descriptions of the visual appearance of the nebulosities were cleared up, leading to a better understanding of what Herschel actually saw. Possible sources of error were excluded, or at least qualitatively estimated, for certain regions. One outcome of this project is a completely revised list of fields of largely extended nebulosity observed by Herschel, which certainly does not prove the correctness of all of his observations but does at least clarify the context in which they should be regarded. As a useful by-product, some poorly-known first-time observations of nebulous fields that are weil known today by means of photography can now be assigned to William Herschel.
No associations
LandOfFree
William Herschel's fifty-two fields of extensive diffused nebulosity - a revision does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with William Herschel's fifty-two fields of extensive diffused nebulosity - a revision, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and William Herschel's fifty-two fields of extensive diffused nebulosity - a revision will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-747996