Why is Helfenstein's claim about equichordal points false?

Details Why is Helfenstein's claim about equichordal points false? Why is Helfenstein's claim about equichordal points false?

2012-02-08

arxiv.org/abs/1202.1609v1

Mathematics

Dynamical Systems

24 pages, 3 figures

Scientific paper

This article explains why a paper by Heinz G. Helfenstein entitled "Ovals with equichordal points", published in J.London Math.Soc.31, 54-57, 1956, is incorrect. We point out a computational error which renders his conclusions invalid. More importantly, we explain that the method cannot be used to solve the equichordal point problem with the method presented there. Today, there is a solution to the problem: Marek R. Rychlik, "A complete solution to the equichordal point problem of Fujiwara, Blaschke, Rothe and Weizenb\"ock", Inventiones Mathematicae 129 (1), 141-212, 1997. However, some mathematicians still point to Helfenstein's paper as a plausible path to a simpler solution. We show that Helfenstein's method cannot be salvaged. The fact that Helfenstein's argument is not correct was known to Wirsing, but he did not explicitly point out the error. This article points out the error and the reasons for the failure of Helfenstein's approach in an accessible, and hopefully enjoyable way.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Why is Helfenstein's claim about equichordal points false? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Why is Helfenstein's claim about equichordal points false?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why is Helfenstein's claim about equichordal points false? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-64115