Why approximate Bayesian computational (ABC) methods cannot handle model choice problems

Statistics – Computation

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

22 pages, 3 figures

Scientific paper

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), also known as likelihood-free methods, have become a favourite tool for the analysis of complex stochastic models, primarily in population genetics but also in financial analyses. We advocated in Grelaud et al. (2009) the use of ABC for Bayesian model choice in the specific case of Gibbs random fields (GRF), relying on a sufficiency property mainly enjoyed by GRFs to show that the approach was legitimate. Despite having previously suggested the use of ABC for model choice in a wider range of models in the DIY ABC software (Cornuet et al., 2008), we present theoretical evidence that the general use of ABC for model choice is fraught with danger in the sense that no amount of computation, however large, can guarantee a proper approximation of the posterior probabilities of the models under comparison.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Why approximate Bayesian computational (ABC) methods cannot handle model choice problems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Why approximate Bayesian computational (ABC) methods cannot handle model choice problems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why approximate Bayesian computational (ABC) methods cannot handle model choice problems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-419442

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.