Computer Science – Social and Information Networks
Scientific paper
2012-04-17
Computer Science
Social and Information Networks
Presented at Collective Intelligence conference, 2012 (arXiv:1204.2991)
Scientific paper
As social Q&A sites gain popularity, it is important to understand how users judge the authoritativeness of users and content, build reputation, and identify and promote high quality content. We conducted a study of emerging social Q&A site Quora. First, we describe user activity on Quora by analyzing data across 60 question topics and 3917 users. Then we provide a rich understanding of issues of authority, reputation, and quality from in-depth interviews with ten Quora users. Our results show that primary sources of information on Quora are judged authoritative. Also, users judge the reputation of other users based on their past contributions. Social voting helps users identify and promote good content but is prone to preferential attachment. Combining social voting with sophisticated algorithms for ranking content might enable users to better judge others' reputation and promote high quality content.
Chi Ed H.
Hong Lichan
Paul Sharoda A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Who is Authoritative? Understanding Reputation Mechanisms in Quora does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Who is Authoritative? Understanding Reputation Mechanisms in Quora, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Who is Authoritative? Understanding Reputation Mechanisms in Quora will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-289600