What is and What should be Time?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

30 pages, LaTeX, no figures (Enlarged. To appear in ``Apeiron" no. 2, vol. 3, 1996)

Scientific paper

The notions of time in the theories of Newton and Einstein are reviewed so that certain of their assumptions are clarified. These assumptions will be seen as the causes of the incompatibility between the two different ways of understanding time, and seen to be philosophical hypotheses, rather than purely scientific ones. The conflict between quantum mechanics and (general) relativity is shown to be a consequence of retaining the Newtonian conception of time in the context of quantum mechanics. As a remedy for this conflict, an alternative definition of time -- earlier presented in Kitada 1994a and 1994b -- is reviewed with less mathematics and more emphasis on its philosophical aspects. Based on this revised understanding of time it is shown that quantum mechanics and general relativity are reconciled while preserving the current mathematical formulations of both theories.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

What is and What should be Time? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with What is and What should be Time?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and What is and What should be Time? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-643300

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.