Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Scientific paper
1994-08-20
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
30 pages, LaTeX, no figures (Enlarged. To appear in ``Apeiron" no. 2, vol. 3, 1996)
Scientific paper
The notions of time in the theories of Newton and Einstein are reviewed so that certain of their assumptions are clarified. These assumptions will be seen as the causes of the incompatibility between the two different ways of understanding time, and seen to be philosophical hypotheses, rather than purely scientific ones. The conflict between quantum mechanics and (general) relativity is shown to be a consequence of retaining the Newtonian conception of time in the context of quantum mechanics. As a remedy for this conflict, an alternative definition of time -- earlier presented in Kitada 1994a and 1994b -- is reviewed with less mathematics and more emphasis on its philosophical aspects. Based on this revised understanding of time it is shown that quantum mechanics and general relativity are reconciled while preserving the current mathematical formulations of both theories.
Fletcher Lancelot R.
Kitada Hitoshi
No associations
LandOfFree
What is and What should be Time? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with What is and What should be Time?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and What is and What should be Time? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-643300