VLF versus MF heating of the lower ionosphere

Details VLF versus MF heating of the lower ionosphere VLF versus MF heating of the lower ionosphere

Aug 1991

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1991jgr....9614179d&link_type=abstract

Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 96, Aug. 1, 1991, p. 14,179-14,182.

Other

8

Ionospheric Heating, Ionospheric Propagation, Lower Ionosphere, Radio Frequency Heating, Radio Transmitters, Signal Processing, Very Low Frequencies, Wave Propagation

Scientific paper

The perturbation in the signal strength of a VLF transmitter by another transmitter heating the ionosphere on the great circle path to the receiver is calculated for two cases: the NASA-Palmer path heated by the VLF transmitter, NAU, and the Omega Norway-Skibotn path heated by the MF transmitter, 'Heating', near Tromso. Comparison implies either that VLF heating is over 100 times more effective than MF heating in terms of the perturbation produced, per RF heating watt, in VLF propagation in the earth-ionosphere waveguide or that the observed effect at Palmer is fortuitous or spurious.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

VLF versus MF heating of the lower ionosphere does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with VLF versus MF heating of the lower ionosphere, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and VLF versus MF heating of the lower ionosphere will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1739687