Two Hands Are Better Than One (up to constant factors)

Computer Science – Computational Complexity

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

We study the difference between the standard seeded model of tile self-assembly, and the "seedless" two-handed model of tile self-assembly. Most of our results suggest that the two-handed model is more powerful. In particular, we show how to simulate any seeded system with a two-handed system that is essentially just a constant factor larger. We exhibit finite shapes with a busy-beaver separation in the number of distinct tiles required by seeded versus two-handed, and exhibit an infinite shape that can be constructed two-handed but not seeded. Finally, we show that verifying whether a given system uniquely assembles a desired supertile is co-NP-complete in the two-handed model, while it was known to be polynomially solvable in the seeded model.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Two Hands Are Better Than One (up to constant factors) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Two Hands Are Better Than One (up to constant factors), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Two Hands Are Better Than One (up to constant factors) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-434

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.