Mathematics – Representation Theory
Scientific paper
2006-06-07
Mathematics
Representation Theory
11 pages, no figures, accepted in Math. Res. Lett
Scientific paper
The purpose of the present paper is to discuss the following conjecture of Fel'shtyn and Hill, which is a generalization of the classical Burnside theorem: Let G be a countable discrete group, f its automorphism, R(f) the number of f-conjugacy classes (Reidemeister number), S(f):=# Fix (f^) the number of f-invariant equivalence classes of irreducible unitary representations. If one of R(f) and S(f) is finite, then it is equal to the other. This conjecture plays a very important role in the theory of twisted conjugacy classes having a long history and has very serious consequences in Dynamics, while its proof needs rather fine results from Functional and Non-commutative Harmonic Analysis. It was proved for finitely generated groups of type I in a previous paper. In the present paper this conjecture is disproved for non-type I groups. More precisely, an example of a group and its automorphism is constructed such that the number of fixed irreducible representations is greater than the Reidemeister number. But the number of fixed finite-dimensional representations (i.e. the number of invariant finite-dimensional characters) in this example coincides with the Reidemeister number.
Fel'shtyn Alexander
Troitsky Evgenij
Vershik Anatoly
No associations
LandOfFree
Twisted Burnside theorem for type II_1 groups: an example does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Twisted Burnside theorem for type II_1 groups: an example, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Twisted Burnside theorem for type II_1 groups: an example will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-698426