Towards self-consistent modelling of the Martian dichotomy: The influence of one-ridge convection on crustal thickness distribution

Statistics – Computation

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Introduction In order to find a possible explanation for the origin of the Martian crustal dichotomy, a number of recent papers have examined the effect of layered viscosity on the evolution of a degree-1 mantle convection, e.g. [1] and [2]. It was found that a mid-mantle viscosity jump in the Martian mantle, combined with highly temperature- and depth-dependent viscosity, are effective in developing a degree-1 convection within 200-300 Million years of core formation. Such a layered viscosity profile could be justified by Martian mineralogy, where both olivine to spinel and garnet/pyroxene to majorite transitions occur below a mantle depth of 1000 km. All of these high-pressure mineral phases show higher strength than their corresponding upper mantle phases and thus a higher viscosity might be expected [3]. However, the actual effect of a degree-1 convective planform on the crustal thickness distribution has not yet been demonstrated. So far, it has not been obvious whether a thinner crust, due to sublithospheric erosion and crustal thinning, or a thicker crust, due to enhanced crustal production, would form above the hemisphere of mantle upwelling. Also, the general shape of the dichotomy, which is not symmetrically hemispherical, has not yet been fully investigated. In this study we therefore discuss, how the evolution of low-degree mantle convection inside the planet Mars is reflected on its surface in terms of crustal thickness distribution. This will allow us to draw some conclusions towards a possible theory of how the dichotomy was formed in early Martian history. Method This study involves full planet-scale modelling of the crustal patterns produced by 3D-spherical models of Martian mantle convection. All results are computed using the finitevolume multigrid code StagYY [4]. By using tracer particles to track composition, a self-consistent treatment modelling melting and chemical differentiation has been added to models of thermal convection. This allows us to obtain model maps of the crustal thickness distribution as it evolves with time on the whole planetary surface due to underlying convection patterns. To obtain rapid reduction of convective degree, a strongly depth- and temperature-dependent rheology has been applied with additional viscosity jumps at each mineralogical phase transition. See Fig. 1 for a typical viscosity profile used in this study. Results and Discussion Due to very expensive computation (3.5 Million gridpoints, 50 Million tracer particles), the parameter range for this study has to be rather narrow. The results of the model runs display a number of consitent features appearing over the examined range of Rayleigh numbers (3.107 to 7.107) and initial temperatures (1500 K to 1600 K). The most striking of the results is not only the fact, that convection rapidly (<200 Myr) evolves into a pattern of very low degree but also that the obtained convective planform, does not satisfy the expectation of a spherically symmetrical one-plume convection (l=1). It is rather like what we would call oneridge convection (see Fig. 2) where the upwelling is a ridgeshaped feature covering a variable angle around the CMB. A closer look at this feature reveals that it consist of two plumes at each end, interlinked by a sheet-like upwelling region of lower intensity. From this point of view, it represents a stable transition state between l=1 and l=2 convection. Most melt in our model runs is generated above the major ridge-shaped upwelling region and thus crustal thickness distribution to a first order reflects the large-scale upwelling pattern in the mantle. Additional melting occurs where small-scale convection is active underneath the rigid lid. Due to this effect, the hemisphere of downwelling is covered by crust, too, but it is remarkably thinner than above major upwellings (Fig. 2). Although mean crustal thickness is slightly overestimated in all of our models, the relative distribution of crustal thickness seems to be quite Marslike. To analyze crustal structure of some of our model runs, we plot histograms of crustal thickness distribution (Fig. 3) and compare it as a reference to a model Martian crust obtained by inverting Mars Orbiter Laser Altimetry (MOLA) topography and gravity data collected by Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft [5]. We find that, although absolute values of crustal thickness are above values inverted for Mars, the relative crust distribution of our best fit model (upper right side in Fig. 3) still shows intriguing similarity to the MOLA model. In fact, the step between the two distinct peaks representing northern lowlands and southern highlands, is the same (26 km) for both our best fit model as well as for MOLA data. Conclusions Although many questions still remain, the obtained results demonstrate that it is indeed possible to form a crustal dichotomy as a consequence of very low degree (l=1 to l=2) mantle convection very early in the planets history and, furthermore, that some of the observed patterns also show intriguing and unexpected first order similarities to the general non-spherical shape of the Martian dichotomy. In all of our models, the region of thick crust came to be located over the region of mantle upwelling, whereas crustal thinning above upwellings seemed to be a rather minor effect. The region of upwelling itself proves not to be strictly hemispherical, but is rather a ridge-like structure spread over more or less one half of the planets body. We call this type of convective planform one-ridge convection in analogy to the commonly known term one-plume convection. This one-ridge convection could well turn out to be a succesfull approach to future, more systematic modelling of the Martian crustal dichotomy. Furthermore, this study demonstrates how important it is to model closely linked processes like thermal convection and melting in an integrative and self-consistent way to gain more insight into terrestrial planetary evolution. Therefore, more ongoing work also focuses on the effect of a combined intrusion-extrusion magmatic model, which we expect to refine future modelling.References [1] Roberts, J. H. and Zhong, Sh. (2006) JGR, 111, E06013. [2] Yoshida, M. and Kageyama, A. (2006) JGR, 111, B03412. [3] Meade, Ch. and Jeanloz, R. (1990) Nature, 348, 533- 535. [4] Tackley, P. J. (2008) PEPI, submitted. [5] Neumann, G. A. et al. (2004) JGR, 109, E08002.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Towards self-consistent modelling of the Martian dichotomy: The influence of one-ridge convection on crustal thickness distribution does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Towards self-consistent modelling of the Martian dichotomy: The influence of one-ridge convection on crustal thickness distribution, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Towards self-consistent modelling of the Martian dichotomy: The influence of one-ridge convection on crustal thickness distribution will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1794110

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.