Computer Science – Social and Information Networks
Scientific paper
2012-02-26
Computer Science
Social and Information Networks
5 pages, 5 figures
Scientific paper
Yelp ratings are often viewed as a reputation metric for local businesses. In this paper we study how Yelp ratings evolve over time. Our main finding is that on average the first ratings that businesses receive overestimate their eventual reputation. In particular, the first review that a business receives in our dataset averages 4.1 stars, while the 20th review averages just 3.69 stars. This significant warm-start bias which may be attributed to the limited exposure of a business in its first steps may mask analysis performed on ratings and reputational ramifications. Therefore, we study techniques to identify and correct for this bias. Further, we perform a case study to explore the effect of a Groupon deal on the merchant's subsequent ratings and show both that previous research has overestimated Groupon's effect to merchants' reputation and that average ratings anticorrelate with the number of reviews received. Our analysis points to the importance of identifying and removing biases from Yelp reviews.
No associations
LandOfFree
The warm-start bias of Yelp ratings does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The warm-start bias of Yelp ratings, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The warm-start bias of Yelp ratings will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-215581