Other
Scientific paper
May 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009agusm.p31b..02h&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Spring Meeting 2009, abstract #P31B-02
Other
5420 Impact Phenomena, Cratering (6022, 8136), 5455 Origin And Evolution, 5470 Surface Materials And Properties, 5475 Tectonics (8149), 5480 Volcanism (6063, 8148, 8450)
Scientific paper
Conventional interpretations of Venus are forced to fit dubious pre-Magellan conjectures that the planet is as active internally as Earth and preserves no ancient surface features. Plate tectonics obviously does not operate, so it is commonly assumed that the surface must record other endogenic processes, mostly unique to Venus. Imaginative systems of hundreds of tiny to huge rising and sinking plumes and diapirs are invoked. That much of the surface in fact is saturated with overlapping large circular depressions with the morphology of impact structures is obscured by postulating plume origins for selected structures and disregarding the rest. Typical structures are rimmed circular depressions, often multiring, with lobate debris aprons; central peaks are common. Marine-sedimentation features are overlooked because dogma deems the plains to be basalt flows despite their lack of source volcanoes and fissures. The unearthly close correlation between geoid and topography at long to moderate wavelengths requires, in conventional terms, dynamic maintenance of topography by up and down plumes of long-sustained precise shapes and buoyancy. A venusian upper mantle much stronger than that of Earth, because it is cooler or poorer in volatiles, is not considered. (The unearthly large so-called volcanoes and tessera plateaus often are related to rimmed circular depressions and likely are products of impact fluidization and melting.) Plains-saturating impact structures (mostly more obvious in altimetry than backscatter) with diameters of hundreds of km are superimposed as cookie-cutter bites, are variably smoothed and smeared by apparent submarine impact and erosion, and are differentially buried by sediments compacted into them. Marine- sedimentation evidence includes this compaction; long sinuous channels and distributaries with turbidite- channel characteristics and turbidite-like lobate flows (Jones and Pickering, JGSL 2003); radar-smooth surfaces and laminated aspect in lander images; and widespread minor structures with neither terrestrial volcanic analogues nor plausible volcanic explanations. Broad tracts of polygonal reticulations 100 m to 5 km in diameter have dimensional and geometric terrestrial analogues in the polygonal faulting shown by 3-D reflection-seismic surveys of dewatered fine-grained sediments in marine basins. Impact-comminuted basaltic crust may dominate the fine sediment. Vast numbers of small low so-called shield volcanoes have geometric analogues in terrestrial mud volcanoes, not magmatic constructs. Less than half of the 1000 small misnamed pristine craters, the only venusian craters accepted by all as of impact origin, in fact are pristine. The rest are variably eroded, their craters partly filled by sediments that often display polygonal faulting, and their aprons partly covered by sediments of surrounding plains. All gradations are displayed between these structures and the more modified but otherwise similar structures from which they are arbitrarily and inconsistently separated. Lunar analogy dates the thousands of large venusian craters, 300-2000 km in rim diameter, as older than 3.8 Ga. Marine sedimentation began before late-stage accretion was complete. The nominally pristine craters are commonly assumed to be younger than 1 Ga but may go back to 3.8 Ga. Venusian oceans persisted long after that, without stillstands sufficient for development of global shorelines and shelves, before complete greenhouse evaporation, deep desiccation, and top-down metamorphism of sediments.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Surface of Venus is Saturated With Ancient Impact Structures, and its Plains are Marine Sediments does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Surface of Venus is Saturated With Ancient Impact Structures, and its Plains are Marine Sediments, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Surface of Venus is Saturated With Ancient Impact Structures, and its Plains are Marine Sediments will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1108124