Computer Science
Scientific paper
Jan 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002iaf..confe.303d&link_type=abstract
IAF abstracts, 34th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, The Second World Space Congress, held 10-19 October, 2002 in Houston, TX, USA.,
Computer Science
Scientific paper
The United States had a nuclear rocket development program from 1955-1973 called Project Rover/NERVA. Twenty reactor tests demonstrated conclusively the superiority, flexibility and reliability of nuclear rocket engines over their chemical counterparts. This paper surveys the technical accomplishments from that perspective, to help illustrate why many call for the program's reestablishment. Most focus on the large NERVA, but this review will consider the little known Small Nuclear Engine. KIWI-B1B was one of the first tests in which nuclear rockets demonstrated their superiority. It ejected its core as it rose to 1000MW (a megawatt equals 50 pounds of thrust). This seems contradictory, how can a `failure' demonstrate superiority? Precisely in this: the reactor remained controllable going to and from 1000MW, still ejecting its core, but still turning out power. That gave insurance to a mission. A solid or liquid chemical engine suffering similar damage would likely shutdown or blow up. KIWI-TNT and Phoebus-1A had planned and unplanned accidents. That verified the safety of nuclear engines in launch operations. NRX/EST and XE-Prime proved they could startup reliably under their own power in a simulated space environment and change power without loss of specific impulse or control, from 20MW to 1000MW and back. That gave flexibility for mid-course corrections, maneuvering between orbits or breaking into orbit. Pewee and the Nuclear Furnace tested fuels to achieve 10 hours of engine operation with 60 recycles (stops and starts). That meant an engine could perform multiple missions. Work started on fuels promising1000 seconds of specific impulse. That meant increased power and payload capacity and speed. This contrasts with the 450 seconds of LOX/LH2. The NERVA of 1971 would be 1500MW, with 10/60 capability and 825 seconds of a specific impulse. Later generation NERVAs would be in excess of 1000 seconds, 3000MW and 10/60. The Nixon Administration cancelled it in 1971. After its demise, the Small Nuclear Engine appeared for unmanned missions. To fit in the space shuttle's 15 by 60 foot cargo bay, the 10 foot long engine would be 400MW, weigh 5600 pounds and use slush hydrogen. That left 50 feet and almost 60,000 pounds for the tank, propellant and payload that could vary in size, but it was nominally 5 tons. It would cost 500 million (in1972 dollars) and take a decade to develop. It had NERVA's operating characteristics, but subsequent generation systems envisioned longer engine life and recycle capability and specific impulses of 1000+ seconds. Nixon ended this in 1973. By reconsidering it instead of a nuclear electric engine that serves only space science, the nation could gain a fast, powerful system that would radically change most future unmanned space missions. With its recycle capability, a single engine could ferry large scientific payloads swiftly throughout the solar system. Yet it also could propel heavy national security and commercial payloads to geo-synchronous orbit. NASA might even offer a satellite retrieval service. Thus, one lesson is clear: it is 1960s era technology, but the Small Engine is not obsolete. If developed, it would serve not just one, but three users yet have growth potential for decades for an ever more expansive space program.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Story of the Nuclear Rocket: Back to the Future does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Story of the Nuclear Rocket: Back to the Future, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Story of the Nuclear Rocket: Back to the Future will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1331508