Other
Scientific paper
Dec 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007agufmin53b1209k&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2007, abstract #IN53B-1209
Other
2799 General Or Miscellaneous, 6339 System Design, 7599 General Or Miscellaneous, 7899 General Or Miscellaneous, 7999 General Or Miscellaneous
Scientific paper
There are a variety of data models in the physical sciences, some of which are in overlapping domains. Each of the data models have been derived in different ways. Some have been based on formal ontologies, others on informal ontologies and others on relational schemas. An additional complication is that different international agencies have divided the physical science domains into different sub-domains leading to some confusion as to which data model to adopt. The most prevalent data models in use today are the Planetary Data System (PDS), Space Physics Archive Search and Extract (SPASE), Virtual Solar Terrestrial Observatory (VSTO), the International Virtual Observatory Alliance (IVOA) and the Global Change Master Directory (GCMD). We take a comparative look at the various data models and ask the questions: Can they be reconciled? Is it possible to have a Rosetta Model to translate between each of the models? What role can ontologies play in defining a Rosetta Model?
Fox Patrick
Harvey Chris
King Terence A.
McGuinness Deborah L.
Roberts Daniel A.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Rosetta Model: Can the Different Physical Science Data Models be Reconciled? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Rosetta Model: Can the Different Physical Science Data Models be Reconciled?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Rosetta Model: Can the Different Physical Science Data Models be Reconciled? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1410203