The Role of Incentives for Opening Monopoly Markets: Comparing GTE and BOC Cooperation with Local Entrants

Details The Role of Incentives for Opening Monopoly Markets: Comparing GTE and BOC Cooperation with Local Entrants The Role of Incentives for Opening Monopoly Markets: Comparing GTE and BOC Cooperation with Local Entrants

2001-09-06

arxiv.org/abs/cs/0109008v1

Computer Science

Computers and Society

29th TPRC Conference, 2001

Scientific paper

While the 1996 Telecommunications Act requires all incumbent local telephone companies to cooperate with local entrants, section 271 of the Act provides the Bell companies (but not GTE) additional incentives to cooperate. Using an original data set, I compare the negotiations of AT&T, as a local entrant, with GTE and with the Bell companies in states where both operate. My results suggest that the differential incentives matter: The Bells accommodate entry more than does GTE, as evidenced in quicker agreements, less litigation, and more favorable prices offered for network access. Consistent with this, there is more entry into Bell territories

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

The Role of Incentives for Opening Monopoly Markets: Comparing GTE and BOC Cooperation with Local Entrants does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The Role of Incentives for Opening Monopoly Markets: Comparing GTE and BOC Cooperation with Local Entrants, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Role of Incentives for Opening Monopoly Markets: Comparing GTE and BOC Cooperation with Local Entrants will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-384665