Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1995-12-14
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
to appear in ``Jets from Stars and Galactic Nuclei'', Springer Lecture Notes, plain TeX, 4 pages, also at http://www.astro.u
Scientific paper
We present a simple argument that the missing x-ray flux from the Galactic Center source Sgr~A* ist not evidence {\it against} -- as claimed by Goldwurm et al. 1994 -- but rather indirect evidence {\it for} the presence of a supermassive black hole. The radio spectrum provides a strict {\it lower} limit for the size of Sgr~A* ($R>3\cdot 10^{11}$cm). A more compact source would be completely synchrotron self-absorbed. This size is $10^6$ times larger than a stellar-mass black hole, yet the bolometric radio luminosity is comparable to or even larger than the x-ray luminosity where matter accreting onto a {\it stellar-mass} black hole would inevitably radiate the {\it bulk} of its luminosity. Hence, either the bulk of the accretion power is radiated in the UV (where the limits are higher), or the accretion has to stop at the radio-scale to avoid producing x-rays brighter than the radio emission. Both would be a natural consequence of a supermasive black hole with $\sim10^6M_{\sun}$.
Biermann Peter L.
Falcke Heino
No associations
LandOfFree
The missing x-rays in Sgr A*: evidence for - not against - a supermassive black hole does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The missing x-rays in Sgr A*: evidence for - not against - a supermassive black hole, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The missing x-rays in Sgr A*: evidence for - not against - a supermassive black hole will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-651340