Mathematics – Probability
Scientific paper
Feb 1989
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1989a%26a...211....1c&link_type=abstract
Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 211, no. 1, Feb. 1989, p. 1-8.
Mathematics
Probability
21
Dwarf Stars, F Stars, Giant Stars, K Stars, Milky Way Galaxy, Astronomical Models, Error Analysis, Mass Distribution, Probability Distribution Functions, Stellar Luminosity
Scientific paper
The method used by Bahcall (1984) in his computation of the density law of star samples obtained by Upgren (1962, 1963) is reexamined in order to determine the cause of the conflict between Bahcall's finding of large amounts of unseen mass and the estimate of mass density obtained by the method proposed by Bienayme et al. (1987). In particular, the fit of Bahcall's density models on the original Upgren star count data using the m-log(pi) method is discussed. It is shown that the m-log(pi) method provides estimates of the density that are significantly biased resulting in getting too much missing mass.
Bienayme Olivier
Creze Michel
Robin Annie C.
No associations
LandOfFree
The mass density in our Galaxy. II - F dwarfs and K giants as density tracers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The mass density in our Galaxy. II - F dwarfs and K giants as density tracers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The mass density in our Galaxy. II - F dwarfs and K giants as density tracers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1884128