Biology – Quantitative Biology – Quantitative Methods
Scientific paper
2011-01-26
Biology
Quantitative Biology
Quantitative Methods
Scientific paper
Motivation: Biomarker discovery from high-dimensional data is a crucial problem with enormous applications in biology and medicine. It is also extremely challenging from a statistical viewpoint, but surprisingly few studies have investigated the relative strengths and weaknesses of the plethora of existing feature selection methods. Methods: We compare 32 feature selection methods on 4 public gene expression datasets for breast cancer prognosis, in terms of predictive performance, stability and functional interpretability of the signatures they produce. Results: We observe that the feature selection method has a significant influence on the accuracy, stability and interpretability of signatures. Simple filter methods generally outperform more complex embedded or wrapper methods, and ensemble feature selection has generally no positive effect. Overall a simple Student's t-test seems to provide the best results. Availability: Code and data are publicly available at http://cbio.ensmp.fr/~ahaury/.
Gestraud Pierre
Haury Anne-Claire
Vert Jean-Philippe
No associations
LandOfFree
The influence of feature selection methods on accuracy, stability and interpretability of molecular signatures does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The influence of feature selection methods on accuracy, stability and interpretability of molecular signatures, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The influence of feature selection methods on accuracy, stability and interpretability of molecular signatures will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-418590