The inconsistency of the h-index

Details The inconsistency of the h-index The inconsistency of the h-index

2011-08-19

arxiv.org/abs/1108.3901v1

Computer Science

Digital Libraries

Scientific paper

The h-index is a popular bibliometric indicator for assessing individual scientists. We criticize the h-index from a theoretical point of view. We argue that for the purpose of measuring the overall scientific impact of a scientist (or some other unit of analysis) the h-index behaves in a counterintuitive way. In certain cases, the mechanism used by the h-index to aggregate publication and citation statistics into a single number leads to inconsistencies in the way in which scientists are ranked. Our conclusion is that the h-index cannot be considered an appropriate indicator of a scientist's overall scientific impact. Based on recent theoretical insights, we discuss what kind of indicators can be used as an alternative to the h-index. We pay special attention to the highly cited publications indicator. This indicator has a lot in common with the h-index, but unlike the h-index it does not produce inconsistent rankings.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

The inconsistency of the h-index does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The inconsistency of the h-index, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The inconsistency of the h-index will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-107958