Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Scientific paper
2008-08-31
Central Eur.J.Phys.9:576-615,2011
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
References are added and updated, Introduction is extended, Subsection 3.5 is added, 83 pages; corresponds to the published ve
Scientific paper
10.2478/s11534-010-0072-2
A conventional wisdom often perpetuated in the literature states that: (i) a 3+1 decomposition of space-time into space and time is synonymous with the canonical treatment and this decomposition is essential for any Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity (GR); (ii) the canonical treatment unavoidably breaks the symmetry between space and time in GR and the resulting algebra of constraints is not the algebra of four-dimensional diffeomorphism; (iii) according to some authors this algebra allows one to derive only spatial diffeomorphism or, according to others, a specific field-dependent and non-covariant four-dimensional diffeomorphism; (iv) the analyses of Dirac [Proc. Roy. Soc. A 246 (1958) 333] and of ADM [Arnowitt, Deser and Misner, in "Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research" (1962) 227] of the canonical structure of GR are equivalent. We provide some general reasons why these statements should be questioned. Points (i-iii) have been shown to be incorrect in [Kiriushcheva et al., Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 5101] and now we thoroughly re-examine all steps of the Dirac Hamiltonian formulation of GR. We show that points (i-iii) above cannot be attributed to the Dirac Hamiltonian formulation of GR. We also demonstrate that ADM and Dirac formulations are related by a transformation of phase-space variables from the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$ to lapse and shift functions and the three-metric $g_{km}$, which is not canonical. This proves that point (iv) is incorrect. Points (i-iii) are mere consequences of using a non-canonical change of variables and are not an intrinsic property of either the Hamilton-Dirac approach to constrained systems or Einstein's theory itself.
Kiriushcheva N.
Kuz'min S. V.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity: myths and reality does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity: myths and reality, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity: myths and reality will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-578395