The general Penrose inequality: lessons from numerical evidence

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Two formulae are corrected at the end of Sec. 6

Scientific paper

Formulation of the Penrose inequality becomes ambiguous when the past and future apparent horizons do cross. We test numerically several natural possibilities of stating the inequality in punctured and boosted single- and double- black holes, in a Dain-Friedrich class of initial data and in conformally flat spheroidal data.The Penrose inequality holds true in vacuum configurations for the outermost element amongst the set of disjoint future and past apparent horizons (as expected)and (unexpectedly) for each of the outermost past and future apparent horizons, whenever these two bifurcate from an outermost minimal surface, regardless of whether they intersect or remain disjoint. In systems with matter the conjecture breaks down only if matter does not obey the dominant energy condition.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The general Penrose inequality: lessons from numerical evidence does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The general Penrose inequality: lessons from numerical evidence, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The general Penrose inequality: lessons from numerical evidence will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-121319

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.