Computer Science – Computational Complexity
Scientific paper
2009-01-23
Computer Science
Computational Complexity
27 pages, 7 figures
Scientific paper
Given a binary dominance relation on a set of alternatives, a common thread in the social sciences is to identify subsets of alternatives that satisfy certain notions of stability. Examples can be found in areas as diverse as voting theory, game theory, and argumentation theory. Brandt and Fischer [BF08] proved that it is NP-hard to decide whether an alternative is contained in some inclusion-minimal upward or downward covering set. For both problems, we raise this lower bound to the Theta_{2}^{p} level of the polynomial hierarchy and provide a Sigma_{2}^{p} upper bound. Relatedly, we show that a variety of other natural problems regarding minimal or minimum-size covering sets are hard or complete for either of NP, coNP, and Theta_{2}^{p}. An important consequence of our results is that neither minimal upward nor minimal downward covering sets (even when guaranteed to exist) can be computed in polynomial time unless P=NP. This sharply contrasts with Brandt and Fischer's result that minimal bidirectional covering sets (i.e., sets that are both minimal upward and minimal downward covering sets) are polynomial-time computable.
Baumeister Dorothea
Brandt Felix
Fischer Felix
Hoffmann Jan
Rothe Joerg
No associations
LandOfFree
The Complexity of Computing Minimal Unidirectional Covering Sets does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Complexity of Computing Minimal Unidirectional Covering Sets, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Complexity of Computing Minimal Unidirectional Covering Sets will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-66137