The Basque task: did systems perform in the upperbound?

Details The Basque task: did systems perform in the upperbound? The Basque task: did systems perform in the upperbound?

2002-04-12

arxiv.org/abs/cs/0204029v1

Proceedings of the SENSEVAL-2 Workshop. In conjunction with ACL'2001/EACL'2001. Toulouse

Computer Science

Computation and Language

4 pages

Scientific paper

In this paper we describe the Senseval 2 Basque lexical-sample task. The task comprised 40 words (15 nouns, 15 verbs and 10 adjectives) selected from Euskal Hiztegia, the main Basque dictionary. Most examples were taken from the Egunkaria newspaper. The method used to hand-tag the examples produced low inter-tagger agreement (75%) before arbitration. The four competing systems attained results well above the most frequent baseline and the best system scored 75% precision at 100% coverage. The paper includes an analysis of the tagging procedure used, as well as the performance of the competing systems. In particular, we argue that inter-tagger agreement is not a real upperbound for the Basque WSD task.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

The Basque task: did systems perform in the upperbound? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The Basque task: did systems perform in the upperbound?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Basque task: did systems perform in the upperbound? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-667415