The Anderson-Weber strategy is not optimal for symmetric rendezvous search on K4

Mathematics – Optimization and Control

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

6 pages

Scientific paper

We consider the symmetric rendezvous search game on a complete graph of n locations. In 1990, Anderson and Weber proposed a strategy in which, over successive blocks of n-1 steps, the players independently choose either to stay at their initial location or to tour the other n-1 locations, with probabilities p and 1-p, respectively. Their strategy has been proved optimal for n=2 with p=1/2, and for n=3 with p=1/3. The proof for n=3 is very complicated and it has been difficult to guess what might be true for n>3. Anderson and Weber suspected that their strategy might not be optimal for n>3, but they had no particular reason to believe this and no one has been able to find anything better. This paper describes a strategy that is better than Anderson--Weber for n=4. However, it is better by only a tiny fraction of a percent.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The Anderson-Weber strategy is not optimal for symmetric rendezvous search on K4 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The Anderson-Weber strategy is not optimal for symmetric rendezvous search on K4, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Anderson-Weber strategy is not optimal for symmetric rendezvous search on K4 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-517778

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.