Testing statistical palaeomagnetic field models against directional data affected by measurement errors

Details Testing statistical palaeomagnetic field models against directional data affected by measurement errors Testing statistical palaeomagnetic field models against directional data affected by measurement errors

Nov 2006

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006geoji.167..635k&link_type=abstract

Geophysical Journal International, Volume 167, Issue 2, pp. 635-648.

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

9

Archaeomagnetism, Geomagnetism, Palaeomagnetism, Potential Field, Spherical Harmonics, Statistical Methods

Scientific paper

In a previous paper, Khokhlov et al. introduced a method to test the compatibility of so-called `giant Gaussian process' (GGP) statistical models of the palaeomagnetic field against any palaeosecular variation database. This method did not take measurement errors into account. It therefore lacked practical usefulness. In the present paper, we remedy this and generalize the method to account for measurement errors in a way consistent with both the assumptions underlying the GGP approach and the nature of those errors. The method is implemented to test GGP models against any directional data set affected by Fisherian errors. Simulations show that the method can usefully discriminate which GGP model best explains a given data set. Applying the method to test six published GGP models against a test Bruhnes stable polarity data set extracted from the Quidelleur et al. database, it is found that all but one model (that of Quidelleur & Courtillot) should be rejected. Although this result should be taken with care, and does not necessarily imply that this model is superior to other models (Quidelleur & Courtillot precisely used the Quidelleur et al. database to infer their model), it clearly shows that in practice also, and with the databases currently available, the method can discriminate various candidate GGP models. It also shows that the statistical behaviour of the geomagnetic field at times of stable polarity can indeed be described in a consistent way in terms of a GGP model. This `forward' testing method could ultimately be used to design an `inverse' approach to GGP modelling of the palaeomagnetic field.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Testing statistical palaeomagnetic field models against directional data affected by measurement errors does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Testing statistical palaeomagnetic field models against directional data affected by measurement errors, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Testing statistical palaeomagnetic field models against directional data affected by measurement errors will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1314873