Testing Probabilistic Processes: Can Random Choices Be Unobservable?

Computer Science – Logic in Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

24 pages

Scientific paper

A central paradigm behind process semantics based on observability and testing is that the exact moment of occurring of an internal nondeterministic choice is unobservable. It is natural, therefore, for this property to hold when the internal choice is quantified with probabilities. However, ever since probabilities have been introduced in process semantics, it has been a challenge to preserve the unobservability of the random choice, while not violating the other laws of process theory and probability theory. This paper addresses this problem. It proposes two semantics for processes where the internal nondeterminism has been quantified with probabilities. The first one is based on the notion of testing, i.e. interaction between the process and its environment. The second one, the probabilistic ready trace semantics, is based on the notion of observability. Both are shown to coincide. They are also preserved under the standard operators.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Testing Probabilistic Processes: Can Random Choices Be Unobservable? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Testing Probabilistic Processes: Can Random Choices Be Unobservable?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Testing Probabilistic Processes: Can Random Choices Be Unobservable? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-341710

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.