Computer Science
Scientific paper
Feb 1995
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1995adspr..15..153d&link_type=abstract
Advances in Space Research (ISSN 0273-1177), vol. 15, no. 2, p. 153-154
Computer Science
Electron Density Profiles, F 2 Region, Ionospheric Electron Density, Reference Atmospheres, Inversions, Ionograms, Solar Activity, Solar Terrestrial Interactions
Scientific paper
The hmF2 obtained by different models is compared with the parabolic peak height hp and with hmF2 from Paul's inversion method. hp compares well with hmF2 derived by any method based on M(3000)F2 while Paul's inversion gives considerably larger heights, in some cases extreme values. The results of the BES method used in the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) are well correlated with those of the methods based on M(3000)F2, much less well with those derived by Paul's inversion technique.
Ortiz de Adler Nieves
Sauvage de Avila A. M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Testing different models to calculate the peak height at Tucuman does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Testing different models to calculate the peak height at Tucuman, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Testing different models to calculate the peak height at Tucuman will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1629544