Testing astrophysical models for the PAMELA positron excess with cosmic ray nuclei

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 2 figures (RevTex4); revised to include additional data in figures and references; accepted for publication in PRL

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.081104

The excess in the positron fraction reported by the PAMELA collaboration has been interpreted as due to annihilation or decay of dark matter in the Galaxy. More prosaically, it has been ascribed to direct production of positrons by nearby pulsars, or due to pion production during stochastic acceleration of hadronic cosmic rays in nearby sources. We point out that measurements of secondary nuclei produced by cosmic ray spallation can discriminate between these possibilities. New data on the titanium-to-iron ratio from the ATIC-2 experiment support the hadronic source model above and enable a prediction to be made for the boron-to-carbon ratio at energies above 100 GeV. Presently, all cosmic ray data are consistent with the positron excess being astrophysical in origin.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Testing astrophysical models for the PAMELA positron excess with cosmic ray nuclei does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Testing astrophysical models for the PAMELA positron excess with cosmic ray nuclei, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Testing astrophysical models for the PAMELA positron excess with cosmic ray nuclei will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-700251

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.