Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2007-11-09
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
7 pages, 6 figures and 1 table; Comments are welcome
Scientific paper
10.1142/S0218271808012966
We have tested a relative spectral lag (RSL) method suggested earlier as a luminosity/redshift (or distance) estimator, using the generalized method by Schaefer & Collazzi. We find the derivations from the luminosity/redshift-RSL (L/R-RSL) relation are comparable with the corresponding observations. Applying the luminosity-RSL relation to two different GRB samples, we find that there exist no violators from the generalized test, namely the Nakar & Piran test and Li test. We also find that about 36 per cent of Schaefer's sample are outliers for the L/R-RSL relation within 1$\sigma$ confidence level, but no violators at 3$\sigma$ level within the current precision of L/R-RSL relation. An analysis of several potential outliers for other luminosity relations shows they can match the L/R-RSL relation well within an acceptable uncertainty. All the coincident results seem to suggest that this relation could be a potential tool for cosmological study.
Xie Guang-Zhong
Zhang Zhi-Bin
No associations
LandOfFree
Testing a new luminosity/redshift indicator for $γ$-ray bursts does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Testing a new luminosity/redshift indicator for $γ$-ray bursts, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Testing a new luminosity/redshift indicator for $γ$-ray bursts will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-702201