Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Mar 1993
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1993lpi....24..927m&link_type=abstract
In Lunar and Planetary Inst., Twenty-Fourth Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Part 2: G-M p 927-928 (SEE N94-16173 03-91)
Mathematics
Logic
2
Geological Faults, Geological Surveys, Geomorphology, Planetary Craters, Planetary Geology, Planetary Mapping, Tectonics, Venus Surface, Spatial Distribution, Terrain, Venus (Planet)
Scientific paper
Impact crater distributions and morphologies have traditionally played an important role in unraveling the geologic histories of terrestrial objects, and Venus has proved no exception. The key observations are: mean crater retention age about 500 Ma; apparently random spatial distribution; modest proportion (17 percent) of modified craters; and preferential association of modified craters with areas of low crater density. The simplest interpretation of these data alone is that Venus experienced global resurfacing (assumed to be largely volcanic) prior to 500 Ma, after which time resurfacing rates decreased dramatically. This scenario does not totally exclude present geological activity: some resurfacing and crater obliteration is occurring on part of the planet, but at rates much smaller than on Earth. An alternative endmember model holds that resurfacing is also spatially randomly distributed. Resurfacing of about 1 sq km/yr eliminates craters such that a typical portion of the surface has an age of 500 Ma, but actual ages range from zero to about 1000 Ma. Monte Carlo simulation indicates that the typical resurfacing 'patch' cannot exceed about 500 km in diameter without producing a crater distribution more heterogeneous than observed. Volcanic or tectonic processes within these patches must be locally intense to be able to obliterate craters completely and leave few modified. In this abstract, we describe how global geologic mapping may be used to test resurfacing hypotheses. We present preliminary evidence that the dominant mode of resurfacing on Venus is tectonism, not volcanism, and that this process must be ongoing today. Lastly, we outline a conceptual model in which to understand the relationship between global tectonics and crater distribution and preservation.
Grimm Robert E.
Herrick Robert R.
Malin Michael C.
No associations
LandOfFree
Tectonic resurfacing of Venus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Tectonic resurfacing of Venus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Tectonic resurfacing of Venus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1449867