Targeted search for continuous gravitational waves: Bayesian versus maximum-likelihood statistics

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

12 pages, presented at GWDAW13, to appear in CQG

Scientific paper

We investigate the Bayesian framework for detection of continuous gravitational waves (GWs) in the context of targeted searches, where the phase evolution of the GW signal is assumed to be known, while the four amplitude parameters are unknown. We show that the orthodox maximum-likelihood statistic (known as F-statistic) can be rediscovered as a Bayes factor with an unphysical prior in amplitude parameter space. We introduce an alternative detection statistic ("B-statistic") using the Bayes factor with a more natural amplitude prior, namely an isotropic probability distribution for the orientation of GW sources. Monte-Carlo simulations of targeted searches show that the resulting Bayesian B-statistic is more powerful in the Neyman-Pearson sense (i.e. has a higher expected detection probability at equal false-alarm probability) than the frequentist F-statistic.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Targeted search for continuous gravitational waves: Bayesian versus maximum-likelihood statistics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Targeted search for continuous gravitational waves: Bayesian versus maximum-likelihood statistics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Targeted search for continuous gravitational waves: Bayesian versus maximum-likelihood statistics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-364351

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.