Computer Science – Learning
Scientific paper
Apr 2005
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2005aps..apr.x1002h&link_type=abstract
American Physical Society, APS April Meeting, April 16-19, 2005, abstract #X1.002
Computer Science
Learning
Scientific paper
Since the physics community relies strongly on public funding for much of its forefront research, learning how to communicate effectively with a variety of science policy offices in Washington is essential. That communication often takes the form of personal visits or the writing of reports. Because the Office of Management & Budget and the Office of Science & Technology Policy have a joint role in assessing investments in basic physical sciences research, they are important audiences for the physics community. As a former OMB examiner and current OSTP policy analyst, I will explain how you can use the OMB/OSTP R&D Investment Criteria to communicate more effectively with these offices about the federal research programs you care about. I will also analyze recent policy documents, such as Physics of the Universe, Quantum Universe, the HEPAP Long-Range Plan and the FESAC Priorities & Balance report, for their success as vehicles for communicating with important players in the science policy arena.
No associations
LandOfFree
Talking to OMB and OSTP does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Talking to OMB and OSTP, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Talking to OMB and OSTP will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1454816