Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2007-01-26
Astrophys.J.657:L5-L8,2007
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
5 pages including 2 enlarged figures, ApJ Letters, accepted
Scientific paper
10.1086/512974
We show that different stellar-mass estimation methods yield overall mass scales that disagree by factors up to ~2 for the z=0 galaxy population, and more importantly, relative mass scales that sometimes disagree by factors >~3 between distinct classes of galaxies (spiral/irregular types, classical E/S0s, and E/S0s whose colors reflect recent star formation). This comparison considers stellar mass estimates based on (a) two different calibrations of the correlation between K-band mass-to-light ratio and B-R color (Bell et al., Portinari et al.) and (b) detailed fitting of UBRJHK photometry and optical spectrophotometry using two different population synthesis models (Bruzual-Charlot, Maraston), with the same initial mass function in all cases. We also compare stellar+gas masses with dynamical masses. This analysis offers only weak arguments for preferring a particular stellar-mass estimation method, given the plausibility of real variations in dynamical properties and dark matter content. These results help to calibrate the systematic uncertainties inherent in mass-based evolutionary studies of galaxies, including comparisons of low and high redshift galaxies.
Gawiser Eric
Kannappan Sheila J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Systematic Uncertainties in Stellar Mass Estimation for Distinct Galaxy Populations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Systematic Uncertainties in Stellar Mass Estimation for Distinct Galaxy Populations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systematic Uncertainties in Stellar Mass Estimation for Distinct Galaxy Populations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-567882