Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2011-07-08
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
13 pages, 8 figures, comment to community
Scientific paper
We report the discovery of a serious bias in galaxy photometry reported in the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog (Jarrett et al. 2000). Due to an undetermined flaw in the 2MASS surface photometry routines, isophotal and total magnitudes calculated by their methods underestimate the luminosity of galaxies from 10% to 40%. This is found to be due to incorrectly determined scalelengths and isophotal radii, which are used to define the aperture sizes for Kron and total fluxes. While 2MASS metric aperture luminosities are correct (and, thus, colors based on those apertures), comparison to other filters (e.g. optical) based on total magnitudes will produce erroneous results. We use our own galaxy photometry package (ARCHANGEL) to determine correct total magnitudes and colors using the same 2MASS images, but with a more refined surface brightness reduction scheme. Our resulting colors, and color-magnitude relation, are more in line with model expectations and previous pointed observations.
No associations
LandOfFree
Systematic Bias in 2MASS Galaxy Photometry does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Systematic Bias in 2MASS Galaxy Photometry, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systematic Bias in 2MASS Galaxy Photometry will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-674616