Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Jun 1992
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992nascp3153..249h&link_type=abstract
In NASA. Goddard Space Flight Center, Types and Characteristics of Data for Geomagnetic Field Modeling p 249-286 (SEE N92-28620
Mathematics
Logic
Aeromagnetism, Geological Surveys, Geomagnetism, Global Positioning System, Loran C, Magnetic Surveys, Magnetometers, Relief Maps, Topography, Africa, Calibrating, Digital Data, Diurnal Variations, Electromagnetic Absorption, Light Transmission, Navigation, Observatories, Positioning, Protons, Warfare
Scientific paper
Since aeromagnetic surveying started immediately after World War II, a considerable area of the earth's surface both onshore (in excess of 25 million sq. km) has been magnetically surveyed. For about the first 15 years or so, fluxgate magnetometers were employed in aeromagnetic surveys, but the introduction of proton free-precession magnetometers resulted in absolute readings being recorded. Proton precession magnetometers have now been replaced to a large extent by the more sensitive optical absorption magnetometers. Some care has to be taken to calibrate aeromagnetic survey systems and this is best done using a calibration range tied to a magnetic observatory so that accuracies of 10nT or better are achieved for the total field values recorded. Survey navigation has always posed a problem for aeromagnetic surveys, especially offshore. Over land, vertically pointed 35 mm cameras were initially used to recover the aircraft track using a combination of aerial photos and topographic maps. Over featureless areas, it was necessary to utilize existing electronic positioning systems such as Loran C or set up special navigation systems. The advent of the satellite-based Global Positioning Systems (GPS) has to a larger extent solved the navigational problem because there is now almost continuous worldwide coverage to 10 m accuracy in the differential mode. The resultant aeromagnetic data is normally compiled into contour maps in which the diurnal variation and aircraft heading effects are removed. The resultant digital data are normally made publicly available both in gridded and profile form along with the published contour maps. Most aeromagnetic coverage has been obtained in the developed western countries, but elsewhere a considerable amount of surveying has been carried out; as an example, some 80 percent of Africa has been surveyed mostly as a result of aid programs. The data is usually held by the national geological survey or equivalent organizations, but in a number of cases the data (e.g., for the Magnetic Anomaly Map of North America) is also held by the World Data Centres.
No associations
LandOfFree
Survey parameters and availability of low-level aeromagnetic data for geomagnetic field modelling does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Survey parameters and availability of low-level aeromagnetic data for geomagnetic field modelling, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Survey parameters and availability of low-level aeromagnetic data for geomagnetic field modelling will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1522359