Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Oct 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009geoji.179....1k&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Journal International, Volume 179, Issue 2, pp. 1-13.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
4
Satellite Geodesy, Transient Deformation, Global Change From Geodesy, Glaciology
Scientific paper
The vertical movement of the Earth's surface is the result of a number of internal processes in the solid Earth, tidal forces and mass redistribution in the atmosphere, oceans, terrestrial hydrosphere and cryosphere. Close to ice sheets and glaciers, the changes in the ice loads can induce large vertical motions at intraseasonal to secular timescales. The Global Positioning System (GPS) and Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) antennas in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard that started observations in 1991 and 1995, respectively, observe vertical uplift rates on the order of 8 +/- 2 mmyr-1, which are considerably larger than those predicted by postglacial rebound (PGR) models (order 2 mmyr-1). The observations also indicate increased uplift rates starting some time in 2000. A local GPS campaign network that has been reoccupied annually since 1998, reveals a tilting away from the neighbouring glaciers. The Svalbard glaciers have been undergoing melting and retreat during the last century, with increased melting since about 2000. We compared the observed vertical motion to the motion predicted by loading models using a detailed ice model with annual time resolution as forcing. The model predictions correlate well with the observations both with respect to the interannual variations and the spatial pattern of long-term trends. The regression coefficients for predicted and observed interannual variations in height is 1.08 +/- 0.38, whereas the regression coefficient for the predicted and observed spatial pattern turns out to be 1.26 +/- 0.42. Estimates of the predicted secular trend in height due to PGR and present-day melting are on the order of 4.8 +/- 0.3 mmyr-1 and thus smaller than the observed secular trend in height. This discrepancy between predictions and observations is likely caused by the sum of errors in the secular rates determined from observations (due to technique-dependent large-scale offsets) and incomplete or erroneous models (unaccounted tectonic vertical motion, errors in the ice load history, scale errors in the viscoelastic PGR models and the elastic models for present-day melting).
Kierulf Halfdan P.
Köhler Jürgen
Plag Hans-Peter
No associations
LandOfFree
Surface deformation induced by present-day ice melting in Svalbard does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Surface deformation induced by present-day ice melting in Svalbard, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Surface deformation induced by present-day ice melting in Svalbard will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1360275