Other
Scientific paper
Dec 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007agufm.t11c0738z&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2007, abstract #T11C-0738
Other
8103 Continental Cratons, 8120 Dynamics Of Lithosphere And Mantle: General (1213), 8121 Dynamics: Convection Currents, And Mantle Plumes, 8125 Evolution Of The Earth (0325), 8149 Planetary Tectonics (5475)
Scientific paper
Much of the large-scale tectonics on the Earth in the last Ga is predominated by the assembly and breakup of supercontinents Rodinia and Pangea. However, the mechanism that is responsible for supercontinent formation remains poorly understood. Zhong et al [2007] recently showed that mantle convection with moderately strong lithosphere and lower mantle is characterized by a largely degree-1 planform in which one hemisphere is predominated by upwellings while the other by downwellings. They further suggested that the downwellings should attract all the continental blocks to merge in the downwelling hemisphere, thus leading to supercontinent formation there. However, Zhong et al. [2007] did not consider drifting and collision processes of continents. In this study, we explore the supercontinent formation mechanisms by including drifting and collision processes of multiple continental blocks in 3-D spherical mantle convection models. We use thermochemical CitcomS code to model 3-D spherical mantle convection with continental blocks. In our models, particles are used to represent continents and to track their motions. We found that for models with mantle viscosity (i.e., moderately strong lithosphere and lower mantle) that leads to degree-1 convection as reported in Zhong et al. [2007], initially evenly- distributed continental blocks always merge to form a supercontinent on a time-scale of about 6 transit times (i.e., corresponding to about 300 Ma). The hemisphere where a supercontinent is formed is predominated by downwellings as continents merge towards there, while the other hemisphere by upwellings. However, after the supercontinent formation, upwellings are generated beneath the supercontinent. This scenario is qualitatively consistent with what Zhong et al. [2007] proposed. We also found that while some convection models with intrinsically small-scale planforms may also lead to formation of a supercontinent, some other models may fail to produce a supercontinent. For these models with intrinsically small-scale planforms, the merged continental blocks promote long-wavelength mantle structure near the continents. However, in non-continental regions, convective wavelengths remain relatively small. We suggest that time-scales for supercontinent formation and convective wavelengths in non-continental area are important parameters that help constrain mechanisms for supercontinent formation.
McNamara Amelia
Zhang Nan
Zhong Sijia
No associations
LandOfFree
Supercontinent Formation in 3-D Spherical Mantle Convection Models With Multiple Continental Blocks does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Supercontinent Formation in 3-D Spherical Mantle Convection Models With Multiple Continental Blocks, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Supercontinent Formation in 3-D Spherical Mantle Convection Models With Multiple Continental Blocks will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1408541