Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection

Mathematics – Logic

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

18 pages. Corrections and improvements from referee's report made

Scientific paper

We generalise Jensen's result on the incompatibility of subcompactness with square. We show that alpha^+-subcompactness of some cardinal less than or equal to alpha precludes square_alpha, but also that square may be forced to hold everywhere where this obstruction is not present. The forcing also preserves other strong large cardinals. Similar results are also given for stationary reflection, with a corresponding strengthening of the large cardinal assumption involved. Finally, we refine the analysis by considering Schimmerling's hierarchy of weak squares, showing which cases are precluded by alpha^+-subcompactness, and again we demonstrate the optimality of our results by forcing the strongest possible squares under these restrictions to hold.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-429764

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.