Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
2011-06-13
Mathematics
Logic
18 pages. Corrections and improvements from referee's report made
Scientific paper
We generalise Jensen's result on the incompatibility of subcompactness with square. We show that alpha^+-subcompactness of some cardinal less than or equal to alpha precludes square_alpha, but also that square may be forced to hold everywhere where this obstruction is not present. The forcing also preserves other strong large cardinals. Similar results are also given for stationary reflection, with a corresponding strengthening of the large cardinal assumption involved. Finally, we refine the analysis by considering Schimmerling's hierarchy of weak squares, showing which cases are precluded by alpha^+-subcompactness, and again we demonstrate the optimality of our results by forcing the strongest possible squares under these restrictions to hold.
Brooke-Taylor Andrew D.
Friedman Sy-David
No associations
LandOfFree
Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Subcompact cardinals, squares, and stationary reflection will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-429764