Mathematics – Statistics Theory
Scientific paper
2010-05-28
Bernoulli 2011, Vol. 17, No. 2, 592-608
Mathematics
Statistics Theory
Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.3150/10-BEJ295 the Bernoulli (http://isi.cbs.nl/bernoulli/) by the International Statisti
Scientific paper
10.3150/10-BEJ295
We compare estimators of the (essential) supremum and the integral of a function $f$ defined on a measurable space when $f$ may be observed at a sample of points in its domain, possibly with error. The estimators compared vary in their levels of stratification of the domain, with the result that more refined stratification is better with respect to different criteria. The emphasis is on criteria related to stochastic orders. For example, rather than compare estimators of the integral of $f$ by their variances (for unbiased estimators), or mean square error, we attempt the stronger comparison of convex order when possible. For the supremum, the criterion is based on the stochastic order of estimators.
Goldstein Larry
Rinott Yosef
Scarsini Marco
No associations
LandOfFree
Stochastic comparisons of stratified sampling techniques for some Monte Carlo estimators does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Stochastic comparisons of stratified sampling techniques for some Monte Carlo estimators, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Stochastic comparisons of stratified sampling techniques for some Monte Carlo estimators will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-86081