Stochastic comparisons of stratified sampling techniques for some Monte Carlo estimators

Mathematics – Statistics Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.3150/10-BEJ295 the Bernoulli (http://isi.cbs.nl/bernoulli/) by the International Statisti

Scientific paper

10.3150/10-BEJ295

We compare estimators of the (essential) supremum and the integral of a function $f$ defined on a measurable space when $f$ may be observed at a sample of points in its domain, possibly with error. The estimators compared vary in their levels of stratification of the domain, with the result that more refined stratification is better with respect to different criteria. The emphasis is on criteria related to stochastic orders. For example, rather than compare estimators of the integral of $f$ by their variances (for unbiased estimators), or mean square error, we attempt the stronger comparison of convex order when possible. For the supremum, the criterion is based on the stochastic order of estimators.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Stochastic comparisons of stratified sampling techniques for some Monte Carlo estimators does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Stochastic comparisons of stratified sampling techniques for some Monte Carlo estimators, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Stochastic comparisons of stratified sampling techniques for some Monte Carlo estimators will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-86081

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.