Stellar Radiation and the Nature of the Universe

Statistics – Applications

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

THE difference between theory and practice is admirably illustrated by our solid, three-dimensional brain-minds theorising about fourth and other dimensions of space and `matter', and yet visualising a cyclic universe the radiations of which are related only to the superficies of matter! It seems that most of us are still unable to form actual conceptions of the depths of space as a condition different from the depth of a three-dimensional form of physical matter in space. Tyndall believed that the sum of Nature's energy is constant, and that ``the utmost man can do in the pursuit of physical truth or in the applications of physical knowledge is to shift the constituents of the never-varying total... the flux of power is eternally the same.'' Tyndall surely did not imply by this that ``just as much matter is created as destroyed'' (NATURE, April 28, p. 674). He seems to distinguish the constituents from the flux of power with which, say, a sixth-dimensional mind might be quite happy without our physical constituents.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Stellar Radiation and the Nature of the Universe does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Stellar Radiation and the Nature of the Universe, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Stellar Radiation and the Nature of the Universe will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-881729

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.