Computer Science – Learning
Scientific paper
Dec 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007aas...211.0705m&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #211, #07.05; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 39, p.740
Computer Science
Learning
Scientific paper
Most "Astro 101” instructors enter their teaching careers as scientists anxious to impart their passion and knowledge of astronomy to the students sitting before them. The reality of the real teaching and learning environment starts when first confronted by non-science majors. Most of these students resist an authentic engagement of learning science and default to the shortest, easiest path to a high grade. Unfortunately this approach is usually unsuccessful in a course designed to measure students’ deep conceptual understanding rather than their declarative knowledge.
While it's clear that, by itself, lecturing is insufficient to promote robust or deep learning, it is difficult to create a learning environment that elicits students’ initial ideas on a topic, while confronting and resolving their misconceptions and helping them to resolve their reasoning difficulties. Instructional strategies such as think-pair-share, Lecture-Tutorials, Ranking Tasks, and concept maps can be very successful at elevating students’ intellectual engagement and understanding, even when used in large lecture classrooms. But success will ONLY occur if these strategies are correctly implemented. Mastering the many subtle, and sometimes non-intuitive elements of proper implementation can be so challenging that instructors often abandon an active learning environment and default back to lecture-centered instruction even though they know this results in lower levels of understanding overall.
In an effort to improve our teaching, the astronomy faculty of Santiago Canyon College (SCC) have been attending NASA's Center for Astronomy Education Learner-Centered Teaching Excellence workshops. We present our rationale for implementing learner-centered instructional strategies, and the difficulties encountered during implementation. We also present results on how these techniques have promoted meaningful conceptual gains for non-science majors in other equivalent Astro 101 courses. We further report conceptual gains of SCC students, from pre/post testing using the Light, Spectroscopy Concept Inventory, during the 2006-2007 academic school year.
Barembaum Morrie J.
Brissenden Gina
Martino Danielle L.
Prather Edward E.
No associations
LandOfFree
Start With What You Know: Using Our Scientific Background in the Classroom does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Start With What You Know: Using Our Scientific Background in the Classroom, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Start With What You Know: Using Our Scientific Background in the Classroom will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1474180