Spitzer observations of supernova remnants: II. Physical conditions and comparison with HH7 and HH54

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

We have studied the shock-excited molecular regions associated with four supernova remnants (SNRs) - IC443C, W28, W44 and 3C391 - and two Herbig-Haro objects, HH7 and HH54, using Spitzer's Infrared Spectrograph (IRS). The physical conditions within the observed areas are inferred from spectroscopic data obtained from IRS and from SWS and LWS onboard ISO, together with photometric data from Spitzer's Infrared Array Camera (IRAC). Adopting a power-law distribution for the gas temperature in the observed region, the H2 S(0) to S(7) spectral line maps obtained with IRS were used to constrain the gas density, yielding estimated n(H2) in the range 2-4*10^3 cm^-3. The excitation of H2 S(9) to S(12) and high-J CO pure rotational lines, however, require environments several times denser. The inconsistency among the best-fit densities estimated from different species can be explained by density fluctuations within the observed regions. The best-fit power-law index b is smaller than the value 3.8 predicted for a paraboloidal C-type bow shock, suggesting that the shock front has a "flatter" shape than that of a paraboloid. The best-fit parameters for SNRs and Herbig-Haro objects do not differ significantly between the two classes of sources, except that for the SNRs the ortho-to-para ratio (OPR) of hot gas (T> 1000 K) is close to the LTE value 3, while for HH7 and HH54 even the hottest gas exhibits an OPR smaller than 3. Finally, we mapped the physical parameters within the regions observed with IRS and found that the mid-lying H2 emissions - S(3) to S(5) - tend to trace the hot component of the gas, while the intensities of S(6) and S(7) are more sensitive to the density of the gas compared to S(3) to S(5).

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Spitzer observations of supernova remnants: II. Physical conditions and comparison with HH7 and HH54 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Spitzer observations of supernova remnants: II. Physical conditions and comparison with HH7 and HH54, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Spitzer observations of supernova remnants: II. Physical conditions and comparison with HH7 and HH54 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-405183

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.