Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Nov 1987
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1987gecoa..51.2915o&link_type=abstract
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 51, Issue 11, pp.2915-2929
Mathematics
Logic
8
Scientific paper
The ability to identify a formation mechanism for natural gas in a particular environment requires consideration of several geochemical factors when there are multiple sources present. Four primary sources of methane have been identified in Mono Lake. Two of these sources were associated with numerous natural gas seeps which occur at various locations in the lake and extend beyond its present boundary; the two other gas sources result from current microbiological processes. In the natural gas seeps, we observed flow rates as high as 160 moles CH 4 day -1 , and estimate total lakewide annual seep flux to be 2.1 × 10 6 moles CH 4 . Geochemical parameters ( 13 CH 4 , DCH 4 , CH 4 /[ C 2 H 6 + C 3 H 8 ]) and 14 CH 4 measurements revealed that most of the seeps originate from a paleo-biogenic ( 13 CH 4 = about -70%.). natural gas deposit of Pleistocene age which underlies the current and former lakebed. Gas seeps in the vicinity of hot springs had, in combination with the biogenic gas, a prominent thermogenic gas component resulting from hydrothermal alteration of buried organic matter. Current microbiological processes responsible for sources of natural gas in the lake included pelagic meth- anogenesis and decomposition of terrestrial grasses in the littoral zone. Methanogenesis in the pelagic sediments resulted in methane saturation (2-3 mM at 50 cm; 13 CH 4 = about -85%.). Interstitial sulfate decreased from 133 mM at the surface to 35 mM by 110 cm depth, indicating that sulfate-reduction and methanogenesis operated concurrently. Methane diffused out of the sediments resulting in concentrations of about 50 M in the anoxic bottom waters. Methane oxidation in the oxic/anoxic boundry lowered the concentration by >98%, but values in surface waters (0.1-1.3 M) were supersaturated with respect to the atmosphere. The 13 CH 4 (range = -21.8 to -71.8%.) of this unoxidized residual methane was enriched in 13 C relative to methane in the bottom water and sediments. Average outward flux of this methane was 2.77 × 10 7 moles yr -1 . A fourth, but minor source of methane ( 13 CH 4 = -55.2%.) was associated with the decomposition of terrestrial grasses taking place in the lake's recently expanded littoral zone.
Miller Laurence G.
Oremland Ronald S.
Whiticar Michael J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Sources and flux of natural gases from Mono Lake, California does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Sources and flux of natural gases from Mono Lake, California, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Sources and flux of natural gases from Mono Lake, California will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1713886