Source counts in the chronometric cosmology

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4

Astronomical Models, Cosmology, Extragalactic Radio Sources, Time Measurement, Quasars, Red Shift

Scientific paper

The chronometric cosmology (a static, homogeneous, and hence nonevolving model proposed by Segal) is unable to explain the steep number versus flux law N(S) for quasars or extragalactic radio sources. The explanation given by Segal to explain the steep N(S) laws gives at best a small increase over a Euclidean N(S) proportional to S exp-1.5, and requires that the source spectral index be close to but greater than zero to create the effect. For typical radio spectral indices of roughly 0.75, the chronometric model cannot give a quantitative fit to the excess number of 1-3 Jy sources that the standard cosmology attributes to evolution. Thus the chronometric model can explain a steep N(S) law only for flat spectrum sources, while the observations show the steepest N(S) law for steep spectrum sources. Furthermore, the observed N(S) law for ultraviolet excess quasars is steeper than the steepest possible chronometric prediction.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Source counts in the chronometric cosmology does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Source counts in the chronometric cosmology, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Source counts in the chronometric cosmology will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1011659

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.