Some Remarks on Nijenhuis Bracket, Formality, and Kähler Manifolds

Details Some Remarks on Nijenhuis Bracket, Formality, and Kähler Manifolds Some Remarks on Nijenhuis Bracket, Formality, and Kähler Manifolds

2011-03-20

arxiv.org/abs/1103.3877v1

Mathematics

Differential Geometry

9 pages; no figures

Scientific paper

One (actually, almost the only effective) way to prove formality of a differentiable manifold is to be able to produce a suitable derivation $\delta$ such that $d\delta$-lemma holds. We first show that such derivation $\delta$ generates a (1,1)-tensor field (we denote it by $R$). Then, we show that the supercommutation of $d$ and $\delta$ (which is a natural, essentially necessary condition to get a $d\delta$-lemma) is equivalent to vanishing of the Nijenhujis torsion of $R$. Then, we are looking for sufficient conditions that ensure the $d\delta$-lemma holds: we consider the cases when $R$ is self adjoint with respect to a Riemannian metric or compatible with an almost symplectic structure. Finally, we show that if $R$ is scew-symmetric with respect to a Riemannian metric, has constant determinant, and if its Nijenhujis torsion vanishes, then the orthogonal component of $R$ in its polar decomposition is a complex structure compatible with the metric, which gives us a new characterization of K\"ahler structures

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Some Remarks on Nijenhuis Bracket, Formality, and Kähler Manifolds does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Some Remarks on Nijenhuis Bracket, Formality, and Kähler Manifolds, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Some Remarks on Nijenhuis Bracket, Formality, and Kähler Manifolds will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-695871