Statistics – Computation
Scientific paper
Jan 1990
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1990apj...348..700k&link_type=abstract
Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004- 637X), vol. 348, Jan. 10, 1990, p. 700-702. Research, supported by the National Scienc
Statistics
Computation
52
Computational Astrophysics, Time Series Analysis, Variance (Statistics), Periodic Variations, Statistical Analysis
Scientific paper
This paper discusses the theory and assumptions involved in the use of periodograms for seeking periodicities in astronomical time series. It is shown that previously derived formula for 'false alarm' probabilities severely underestimates the potential statistical errors, and that the most often used statistical hypothesis is inappropriate for testing for the presence of specific periodicities. An attempt was made to quantify the concept of 'independent frequencies', but the term is found to be misleading. It is suggested that the term needs reformulation.
No associations
LandOfFree
Significance testing of periodogram ordinates does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Significance testing of periodogram ordinates, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Significance testing of periodogram ordinates will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1560607