Sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies

Details Sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies Sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies

2010-08-19

arxiv.org/abs/1008.3358v1

PloS one, Vol. 6, No. 1. (4 January 2011)

Biology

Quantitative Biology

Genomics

19 pages + 16 pages of supplementary material

Scientific paper

Existing sequence alignment algorithms use heuristic scoring schemes which cannot be used as objective distance metrics. Therefore one relies on measures like the p- or log-det distances, or makes explicit, and often simplistic, assumptions about sequence evolution. Information theory provides an alternative, in the form of mutual information (MI) which is, in principle, an objective and model independent similarity measure. MI can be estimated by concatenating and zipping sequences, yielding thereby the "normalized compression distance". So far this has produced promising results, but with uncontrolled errors. We describe a simple approach to get robust estimates of MI from global pairwise alignments. Using standard alignment algorithms, this gives for animal mitochondrial DNA estimates that are strikingly close to estimates obtained from the alignment free methods mentioned above. Our main result uses algorithmic (Kolmogorov) information theory, but we show that similar results can also be obtained from Shannon theory. Due to the fact that it is not additive, normalized compression distance is not an optimal metric for phylogenetics, but we propose a simple modification that overcomes the issue of additivity. We test several versions of our MI based distance measures on a large number of randomly chosen quartets and demonstrate that they all perform better than traditional measures like the Kimura or log-det (resp. paralinear) distances. Even a simplified version based on single letter Shannon entropies, which can be easily incorporated in existing software packages, gave superior results throughout the entire animal kingdom. But we see the main virtue of our approach in a more general way. For example, it can also help to judge the relative merits of different alignment algorithms, by estimating the significance of specific alignments.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-135479