Mathematics – Algebraic Topology
Scientific paper
2010-02-18
J. Fixed Point Theory Applic. 2,2 (2007), 241-259
Mathematics
Algebraic Topology
19 pages
Scientific paper
Given two maps f1 and f2 from the sphere Sm to an n-manifold N, when are they loose, i.e. when can they be deformed away from one another? We study the geometry of their (generic) coincidence locus and its Nielsen decomposition. On the one hand the resulting bordism class of coincidence data and the corresponding Nielsen numbers are strong looseness obstructions. On the other hand the values which these invariants may possibly assume turn out to satisfy severe restrictions, e.g. the Nielsen numbers can only take the values 0, 1 or the cardinality of the fundamental group of N. In order to show this we compare different Nielsen classes in the root case (where f1 or f2 is constant) and we use the fact that all but possibly one Nielsen class are inessential in the selfcoincidence case (where f1 = f2). Also we deduce strong vanishing results.
No associations
LandOfFree
Selfcoincidences and roots in Nielsen theory does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Selfcoincidences and roots in Nielsen theory, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Selfcoincidences and roots in Nielsen theory will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-362461